Grammatical errors could help in the early detection of schizophrenia

Grammatical errors could help in the early detection of schizophrenia

New research uncovers the hidden language clues in language that could help diagnose schizophrenia earlier and shape more effective treatments.

Study:Relationship between grammar and schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Photo credit: Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock.com

Schizophrenic individuals have significant difficulties with grammar, particularly sentence comprehension and production. ACommunication medicineThe study conducted a comprehensive analysis to assess the extent to which schizophrenia affects language comprehension and creation.

Grammatical impairment in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a serious mental health disorder that affects how an individual thinks, feels and behaves. These patients often experience difficulty communicating with others due to syntactic deficits.

Syntax production involves creating grammatically correct and contextually relevant sentences, while syntax comprehension requires decoding and interpreting syntactic structures in real time. Syntax-level deficits are irregularities in the way words are put together in an order and cause difficulties in communication in patients with schizophrenia.

Impaired syntax production and comprehension lead to conversational incoherence, delusional pursuit, self-cooperativeness, and lack of insight. Assessing the relative deficiencies in syntax production and comprehension is essential as it sheds light on different cognitive mechanisms.

To date, few systematic reviews and meta-analyses have explained the effects of grammatical impairment on sentence comprehension and creation in patients with schizophrenia. Quantifying the extent of grammatical impairment in schizophrenia is crucial because the use of various linguistic markers in speech predicts clinically significant outcomes. Additionally, previous studies have shown that social interactions positively influence functional recovery. Therefore, scientists around the world have focused on developing interventions that improve communication deficits in schizophrenia.

About the study

The systematic review and meta-analysis obtained all relevant literature published up to May 1, 2024 from multiple electronic databases including Web of Science, PubMed (Medline), and Scopus. The search also included Psycinfo to ensure a comprehensive review of available studies.

Published in English and linked to Grammar/Syntax and Schizophrenia was included. Studies involving adults diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and a control group of healthy adults were included.

This systematic review focused primarily on empirical studies using quantitative measures. Cohen's D ratio and logarithmic coefficient of variation were extracted, and Bayesian meta-analysis (BMA) was performed in six domains: two in comprehension and four in production in patient control comparisons. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess data quality with moderators such as age, gender, language and study quality tested using meta-regression.

Study results

Of 820 studies in the initial database search, 45 studies met the eligibility criteria. All studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis were published between 1982 and 2024. These included 1,679 people with schizophrenia and 1,281 healthy participants (controls). The average age of the participants was 32.31 years. Among the selected studies, 29.2% of participants were women. It is important to note that five studies recruited only men, and eight study cohorts included more than 40% of women.

Because there is a lack of a standardized method for estimating grammatical impairment in mental illness, selected studies used different methods in their analysis. This lack of overlap in the measurement of language variables between studies has made it difficult to standardize predictive models for clinical use.

The BMA results provided robust evidence for patients with schizophrenia on syntactic comprehension, production length, error detection, production integrity, and phrasal complexity. Similarly, random effects analysis across the six domain-specific effects also provided evidence for general grammatical impairment in schizophrenia.

Production length, global complexity and integrity showed strong between-study heterogeneity (TAU). Meta-regression analysis showed that age was a significant moderator of global complexity. The bivariate moderator/effect size correlations were not significant for the total symptom severity index or antipsychotics across all domains.

The meta-analysis found that people with schizophrenia differed in their ability to understand syntax, produce longer sentences and use complex phrases. This means that not all individuals with schizophrenia have the same type or degree of grammatical impairment, which has important implications for how language cues are used in a clinical setting.

Robust BMA indicated no significant publication bias within individual meta-analyses. Borrowing the strength analysis suggested that fitting correlations between domains supported all precision estimates.

These results suggest that these individuals understand simpler sentences more effectively and may not possess complete syntactic structure. People with schizophrenia often speak in less sophisticated and shorter sentences and ignore syntactic errors.

In particular, the degree of grammatical impairment was not uniform. The analysis presented possible subgroups of patients with different levels of deficit.

The study also found that syntactic deficits were not strongly related to overall symptom severity or medication dosage, suggesting that grammatical impairments are a characteristic feature rather than just a reflection of general illness severity.

The authors emphasized that syntactic impairment is only one dimension of broader language dysfunction in schizophrenia. Deficits in grammar can interact with or exacerbate other areas such as semantics (meaning) and pragmatics (contextual use of language). For example, reduced production length and phrasal complexity could help mask semantic incoherence in some cases. While improving syntax could benefit general communication, some language differences may serve as compensatory or adaptive mechanisms.

The current literature has limitations, including the diversity of methods for assessing syntax, the underrepresentation of women and non-English speakers, and the likelihood that real-world impairments may be greater than estimates from controlled research samples.

The paper also points out that most available studies are cross-sectional, so the true extent of language impairment over time may be underestimated.

Conclusions

The meta-analysis provided statistically significant evidence linking grammatical impairment to schizophrenia. People diagnosed with schizophrenia have challenges understanding complex syntax and identifying errors in sentences.

Future researchers need to investigate whether grammatical impairment in people with schizophrenia occurs independently of lexico-semantic abnormalities or as part of a broader linguistic impairment. A targeted intervention focusing on language differences could be developed to improve severe symptoms.

The results also highlight the potential for speech-based speech analysis as a tool for early detection and personalized intervention in schizophrenia. Future research should include more diverse populations, examine the relationship between different language domains, and address the practical implications for therapy and daily communication support.

Download your PDF copy now!

Sources: